Friday, December 14, 2012

AUTOMATED AIRWAR THERE ARE NO BIRDS IN VIETNAM


AUTOMATED AIRWAR
THERE ARE NO BIRDS IN VIETNAM
By Coca Crystal
The new war in Indochina' While troops are being brought home, the air war in­creases. It is a new form of war where machines do most of the killing and destruc­ti0n. The population of Indochina has been concentrated in the major cities and placed under American control. The vast regions outside of these controlled areas are subject to American bombing at any time. Well over two-thirds of Indochina has thus been turned into a free fire zone.
The new war is an automated war with machines playing the predominant role and ground troops in a secondary position. Asian foot soldiers are used to supporting American bombers by "showing the flag" after bombing raids, taking out supplies and refugees, providing static defense for the ma­jor cities and bases, and serving as "live bait" to draw guerilla fire so American pilots have some idea where to bomb. The aircraft car­rier has become a mobile platform from which to launch air attacks against ground targets. The aircraft carrier is likely to be the first US force engaged and the last one withdrawn.
The mechanized war consists of air craft, huge air bases and aircraft carriers. The goal of the mechanized war is to replace US per­sonnel with machines. It reduces cost and domestic dissent occasioned by American deaths; it increases efficiency by removing American foot soldiers. From the Armed Forces Journal-"By every conceivable in­dicator our Army that now remains in Viet­nam is in a state approaching collapse, with in­dividual units avoiding or having refused com­bat, murdering their officers, drug-ridden, and dispirited where not near mutinous." And faced with an American public that wants peace, an Army that won't fight, and an enemy that won't lose, the US Govern­ment has found a way to give the appearance of peace while continuing the war. The solu­tion, Westmoreland said, "is to replace, wherever possible, the man with the machine."
Areas have been seeded with airdropped devices that can detect vibrations or people; they detect sounds, they may be sensitive to metallic objects, or to heat radiation or to chemical emanations from human bodies. The information is transmitted by radio to receivers on mountain tops or in continuous­ly airborne communications aircraft (manned lI1d unmanned). The signals are then relayed to a central computer in Udorn, Thailand, where all responses of all sensors are cor­related, and the decision to strike a certain area is finalized.
The code name for the electronic opera­tion is "Igloo White." Barry Goldwater said, "I personally think it (electronic battlefield) has the possibility of being one of the greatest steps forward in warfare since gun powder." The "automated warfare" has many "advantages"-a machine will not defect or take drugs, the machines represent a cheap mercenary army.
Machines cannot discriminate between friend or foe, civilian or soldier, adult or child-all will die who lie in its path. Three things make the air war distinctive. I. Elec­tronic sensors, not men, are finding the targets. 2. The targets are struck by computer directed aircraft filled with elec­tronic equipment. 3. The bombs they drop are designed primarily to maim people and drive them out of "enemy" areas.
"On several occasions after heavy sensor activity the night before, morning patrols sent out in search of enemy bodies found dead water buffaloes instead." Reported in the Congressional Record by Prox­mire-3/23/71 .
50% of all bombs on Indochina are anti­personnel bombs. Anti-personnel bombs are designed for use against unprotected human flesh. One thousand tons of anti-personnel bombs are dropped daily in Indochina! Anti­personnel bombs violate international law. "It is specifically forbidden to employ arms, projectiles, or material calculated to cause unnecessary suffering" -Hague Convention, 1907.
"Most of the victims of anti-personnel bombs are not killed, but maimed. The pellets are designed to cause irregular and hard-to-cure wounds. This serves 2 pur­poses. One, instead of one person being kill­ed and thus removed from military produc­tion, 5 or 6 must care for them. Secondly, badly wounded viets have a greater demoralizing effect on the rest of the popula­tion." From National Action/Research of the Military Industrial Complex.
The sensors used to detect movement or presence of human beings are unparalleled in their imaginative uses. Take for example the air delivered seismic intrusion director-AD­SID. They are dropped from planes and land and burrow into the earth, leaving only the antenna showing. The antenna is designed to look like a tropical plant. Footsteps transmit
vibrations to the computer. But the vibra­tions offer no clue as to whether the person or persons making the steps are man, woman or child-armed or unarmed. Another in­teresting sensor is one made to look like animal droppings. They are made by Honeywell corporations. Another, ACOUBOY microphones, are dropped from planes on lity parachutes made by the Playtex Company (living bra people). The parachute disintegrates when it hits the trees, leaving a fine netting to hold up the camouflaged microphones. Sensors "are also carried onboard aircraft. The "people snif­fer" is designed to detect ammonia in human body odors. The army spent $1.5 million developing this to have it knocked out of commission by the simple use of ingenuity. The Vietnamese hang buckets of urine from the trees. Goodyear radar units are also car­ried onboard aircraft.
Helicopters are also equipped with special devices. Textron, which makes Talon Zip­pers and Schaeffer pens, makes a "prowling hunter" killer chopper that uses an infra-red screen to see in the dark. Puff the Magic Dragon, an old gunship, could boast 6,000 gun pellets per minute. But the new chopper is even more effective. Some 2,000 tons of bombs are dropped daily in Indochina. There are 5 types. The high explosives range anywhere from 250 to 15,000 pounds. There are 20 million bomb craters in In­dochina. I 0 million are in South Vietnam. A standard 500 pound bomb would make a crater I 0 to 50 feet wide and 5 to 50 feet deep. Areas hit by high explosives are im­possible to re-cultivate.
The anti-personnel bombs encompass half, or 1,000 tons daily. They are designed for use against unprotected human flesh. North Vietnamese school children wear straw vests to protect themselves. Each "pineapple" has 250 steel pellets which shoot out horizontally when the bombs hit the ground. But the peo­ple hid in trenches so the "guava" was_ developed. The guava explodes before it hits the ground so the pellets spray diagonally into the trenches in a 360 degree pattern. They cannot destroy a bridge, a truck or a train. Two or three inches of sand bags will stop them. The "Flechette" or nail bomb contains several hundred one-inch barbed nails in each three-inch bomblet. It enters the body shred­ding muscles and body organs.
The incendiary bombs are designed to burn their victims. They vary in temperature and adhesiveness. Napalm is characterized by the "sheets of flames" that envelop everything for hundreds of yards. White Phosphorous burns on contact with oxygen. It cannot be extinguished, which means it usually has to the bone before it goes out. And it burns slowly. On occasion it can burn for 15 days. The greenish light that can be seen at night is produced by the material that continues burning the flesh and bones. Air to ground missiles are being used more frequently in recent years. They are either guided or teleguided missiles. The "walleye" and the "bullpup" are teleguided and are used against caves or suspected underground complexes. They are accurate within 6 feet when dropped from a distance as far as 4 miles.
The last group of bombs are the area denial mines. These are designed to make areas of land uninhabitable for human life. Dragon Tooth and Gravel mines are camouflaged to blend in with the land. They will blow off your foot if you step on them do much the same to your hand if you touch them. The Spider mine or the wide anti-personnel mine has 8 fine wires that extend from it. When a wire is moved, bal bearing like pellets are thrown a distance of meters (180 feet). They are not dropped specific targets but entire areas are f1ood­with them.
The Plain of Jars used to be a thriving socie­ty of 50,000 people. It used to be in Northern Laos. I say "used to be" because it isn't e anymore. In 1969 bombers made daily and destroyed all stationary structures. Nothing was left standing. An old man from the area said, "The planes came like the birds and the bombs fell like the rain. " The villagers in trenches, holes or caves. In
September 1969, CIA-supported Meo troops (an indigenous Laotian tribe) went in and took out 25,000 refugees. It is a deserted wasteland today. The Pathet Lao, the armed fighting guerillas of Laos, have been the unceasing target of the CIA. CIA representatives meet weekly at Udorn Air Force Base in Thailand to draw up target listings.
Not only is the air war ugly, inhumane and technically illegal, it is also rather ineffective. The war is proving to be technology versus the human spirit. And fortunately the humans are holding up. In Cambodia guerillas now control 70-90% of the territory despite a bombing campaign of some 150,000 tons since May 1970.
In Laos, the guerilla forces now hold more territory than before the bombing began. By 1969, "90% [of the young men] wanted to join the Pathet Lao. Nobody really understood what the Pathet Lao meant by 'American Imperialism' before the planes came. But by 1969, the attitude was 'better to die fighting than hiding in the holes.'''-A Pathet Lao volunteer.
The NLF in South Vietnam has also been experiencing a renewed recruitment in­crease. "Twenty-seven months of bombing have had remarkably little effect," said the Pentagon Papers. Half of the bombs miss their targets and provide the guerillas with 27,000 tons of bombs to make booby traps and mines.
The air war violates international law on many levels. The first is the extensive bomb­ings of unprotected villages and hospitals, augmented by our illegal failure to aid civilian bomb casualties. The Plain of Jars held the first society in history to be completely destroyed by total automatic war.
Herbicides are used. About 100 million pounds have been sprayed on Vietnam. Over 5 million acres have been hit. Herbicides can cause genetic damage and already birth ab­normalities are being reported at an alarming rate. Half of the mangrove forests in Viet­nam have been destroyed. There are no birds in Vietnam!
These are the cold and chilling facts. I have tried not to cloud the facts with political rhetoric, but I must express some feelings here. I feel there must be some limitations to what the Government is allowed to do. And the air war in itself is a war crime. We, as a country, have sunk to a new and low depth of inhumanity and brutality. It is time to leam the facts, well enough to convince somebody else. And then ACT. Get off your asses, if for the first time in your life, and do something. No, the war ain't winding down, it's just starting, and 1 for one would be proud to give aid to the heroic and resolutely just people of Indochina. But how, you say?
There is nothing too awful that can be done to the makers of the automated bat­tlefield. Honeywell, ITT, Westinghouse, Textron, McDonnell Douglas, Lockheed, Playtex, Dupont, Boeing, General Electric, Motorola, Singer. Hamilton, Lin-Tempo Voight, Olin, General Motors and Grumman all make millions in Government contracts. Get together with a group of friends. People you know well and trust. And then plot the scheme. "Visit" offices, sabotage, vandalize and terrorize the executives. Hold "die-ins" in their posh suites. Put blood on their carpets. Do anything to dramatize the war. Send them garbage in the mail. Tie up their switchboards (call from paybooths). Infiltrate and wreak havoc. The people who work for these corporations must be made aware of their company's involvement in the war. They must understand their complicity in the senseless killing and destruction of life and land. I can't ask you to care about some Lao­tian or Cambodian peasant who does not even know what an American is, but I can im­plore you to boycott ALL products made by Continental Bakeries, Wonder Bread, Hostess Cupcakes. etc. They are subsidiaries
of ITT who are 'more than accomplices in the air war. Destroy their products in the super­markets, beg people not to buy their pro­ducts. Explain to them why. If they complain that Wonder is cheaper, give them money to make up the difference. People have already begun to campaign against the air war. Hun­dreds of small well-organized attacks would do a lot.
So don't just sit there reading. PLOT, SCHEME AND ACT. Take a chance, take a risk, the Indochinese do it every day. Gamble on something that will surely make you feel good inside. Decide how far you are able to go. Maybe it's leafleting or maybe you are prepared to sabotage. But get it done, right. No more sloppy jobs. We have enough peo­ple underground and many more prepared to descend. An action by ten people at a major corporation will be as effective, if not more effective, than 20,000 people marching at a peace rally.

Postcript to 'Automated Airwar'
On August 30, 1970, 15 minutes before I arrived in Madison, Wise. to get some printing done on behalf of 3 Milwaukee Black Panthers falsely accused of taking a pot-shot at a cop, an enormous explosion destroyed the Army Mathematics Research Center on the UW-Madison campus. When we got to the site of the explosion, we found that someone had left a van-load of fertilizer treated with heating oil and rigged with a dynamite detonator in the parking bay at the base of the building containing the AMRC Computer, leveling it.
Army Math was not, as University 'public relations flacs still insist, a center for purely theoretical research into Mathematics. The best evidence indicates this was the master computer which designed the smaller computers which controlled the "automated battlefield" described in Coca's article. Most important, Army Math was responsible for continuously updating programming of the on-board "counter-measures" computers that enabled the U.S. B-52 fleet to evade the latest in Soviet anti-aircraft technologies supplied to the Vietnamese.
Destruction of Army Math resulted in a loss of an approximately 18 month lead-time that state-of-the-art U.S. countermeasure techniques had enjoyed vis-a-vis the Vietnamese. The Wharf Building (which housed AMRC) had to be rebuilt from scratch, and meanwhile the Vietnamese caught up. Thanks to the SAM-7, in the 2 weeks of the Christmas Bombing of Hanoi, etc. at the end of 1972, Nixon lost 20% of the entire U.S. fleet of B-52's. He was forced to sign the treaty a month later.
The group single-handedly responsible for ending the War, Madison's own New Year's Gang, was subse­quently apprehended in Canada. Karlton Armstrong, his brother Dwight and David Fine were tried for various charges, including the accidental death of a researcher (ironically personally antiwar) who was caught in the blast because Madison cops chose to disregard several warning calls. Leo Burt, the 4th gang member, has never been apprehended.
An immediate side-effect of the explosion was that KALEIDOSCOPE editor Mark Knops, later the founder of TAKEOVER, did 4% months for refusing to testify before a grand jury-and not a single member of the press stepped forward to protest.
Karl and the other members of the New Year's Gang were released at the end of the '70's. Karlton is pro­hibited from travelling or talking much about politics by the terms of his parole. He and his brother never got any medals, but they're local heroes in Madison.
Kissinger, author of the Christmas bombing and the whole Star Wars genocide of Vietnam, Laos and Cam­bodia, was awarded a Nobel Peace Prize. As the peanut farmer once said, Life is unfair.

Sunday, October 28, 2012

Becoming What You Hate, Green Party Threatens Romney Swing Vote

The Romney campaign has been counting on capturing the swing voters in the swing states, conservative stump slamming early in the campaign and tweaking the rhetoric to a final faux liberalized approach later in the rounds to draw in those on the fence.

But the fence sitters won't have it. They have decided to vote Green. Polls show that a majority of people believe in global warming and that something needs done. They have realized and believe that the climate is important, that unfettered saber rattling and the push for more fossil fuel use is not the future they want.

The main stream media wants us to take the middle of the road approach, as always and the middle is always further right than the constituency aplomb.  

Are we dependent on the mainstream media? No, though we are victimized by the adulterated commercialism, exploitation of ignorance and purveyance thereof.

Alternate means of self-determination are running from the "box" and achieving goals by creativity and self learned talent.  The education, security, military and corporate complex of hand me down economics can only drive labor overboard with endless demands on the financial non-existence of the middle and lower classes.

Green canvassers this year are finding a greater interest in the Green Party.

Taxes and the shared burden are not exemplified by those who push the free market anarchy that has recently killed the economy and burdened the impoverished with greater responsibilities in supporting the rich lifestyle infrastructure.

Romney is going the way of the old guard in Russia, perhaps he should run from himself. He has become what he hates?

Saturday, September 29, 2012

August 1774 MA Farmers Rejected financial domination

from http://www.prodsyse.com/conflict/Nonviolence&AmericanRevolution.pdf page 13

"2. Advances for Freedom and Democracy Associated with the American Revolution, 1765-1800

“The American Revolution”, according to Keyssar,50 “produced modest, but only modest, gains in the formal democratization of politics. ... Overall, the proportion of adult men who could vote in 1787 was surely higher than it had been in 1767, yet the shift was hardly dramatic. ... By 1790, ..., roughly 60 to 70 percent of adult white men ... could vote”, compared to “probably less than 60 percent” before.
Important advances achieved by the American Revolution included (a) the widespread adoption of written constitutions with locally elected governors and councils replacing those appointed in England and (b) bills of rights explicitly guarantying certain rights to individuals and limiting the powers of governments. This trend was partly a response to the Coercive Acts of Parliament of 1774, which closed Boston harbor and
changed the Massachusetts colonial charter without consulting the colonists, giving the crown-appointed governor the power to appoint and remove many public officials including judges, justices of the peace, and marshals.51
Introduction of State Constitutions: Farmers in Massachusetts, who were already concerned about the possible confiscation of their property for inability to pay taxes or to repay loans, feared that the new rules would make these public officials less responsive to local concerns and more susceptible to bribery. Beginning in August 1774, when circuit court judges arrived in rural towns all across Massachusetts, they were met by thousands of angry farmers who filled the streets and refused to permit the judges to hold court under the new laws. Judges were asked to resign or at least to ignore the new act and hold court only under the Massachusetts charter of 1691. Each declaration of judges was put to a vote of the locals to determine whether it was acceptable. Under this onslaught of citizen resistance, most of the courts were closed although a few were allowed to operate under the 1691 charter.52
This resulted in a power vacuum in Massachusetts, which was filled53 “[o]n June 19, 1775, [when] the Massachusetts Congress elected a 28-member council that replaced the governor as executive. With this one alteration, ..., the Massachusetts Charter of 1691 became the first state constitution.” The Coercive Acts did not officially affect the other 12 rebellious colonies. However, believing the acts threatened them as well, by 1777 all 13 had adopted new constitutions consistent with their declared independence.54 Facing a King and parliament attempting by fiat to eliminate 150 years of democratic tradition, the colonists agreed to instead to eliminate Britain from their colonial charters. After the war, painfully aware of their vulnerability as 14 independent states (including Vermont, which had previously been disputed between New York and New Hampshire) and of the inadequacies of the Articles of Confederation, revolutionary leaders crafted the current US federal constitution and subjected it to vigorous debate in all the states.

While these were not the first written constitutions in history, they started a trend that has provided written constitutions for nearly all of the world’s advanced industrial democracies and many totalitarian and authoritarian nations. One of the few exceptions is Great Britain, which is a constitutional monarchy without “a written constitution. There is no agreed mechanism [in Britain] for changing the (unwritten) de-facto constitution and not even agreement about what it actually contains.”55
Bills of Rights: Ten of the early state constitutions included bills of rights,56 as had colonial charters since 1639 and the English Bill of Rights57 of 1689, updating the Magna Carta58 of 1215. Major US constitutional documents were translated into many languages and disseminated widely. These included the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, and state constitutions. After the war, the Federalist Papers and the US Constitution of 1787 were also translated and distributed widely. They had a profound effect on constitutional thought around the world, especially in Europe in part via their impact on the French Revolution,59 including the French “Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen” of 1789. Rutland says, “Three months before the French acted, James Madison had already fulfilled a pledge he made during the ratification struggle over the Constitution drafted in 1787” by introducing in the first US House of Representatives 16 proposed amendments, 10 of which had been officially approved by 1791. These became the US Bill of Rights.60
Keyssar reports that the post-war period saw several liberalizations of the right to vote in different states as disfranchised revolutionary war veterans successfully pushed for suffrage in spite of their inability to meet property requirements.61 A study of these changes may help explain the apparent contradiction between Sharp’s comment that violence tends to concentrate power and Keyssar’s observation that the American Revolution contributed to a modest growth in the percent of the population eligible to vote.62


In sum, the American Revolution produced modest but important gains for freedom and democracy. Furthermore, the evidence summarized in this essay suggests that most of these gains were obtained through nonviolent discussions, motivated in part by the political exigencies of the war and facilitated by the accompanying turmoil. However, without the previous 150 years of democratic experience, the colonists might not have found it so easy to agree to disagree agreeably. In particular, the claim that the revolutionary war itself directly advanced freedom and democracy seems inconsistent with the weight of the available evidence.

Saturday, July 28, 2012

Ted Kaczynski created by Harvard Mind Experiments

Source link https://www.wnycstudios.org/podcasts/radiolab/episodes/91721-oops

http://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/audio.wnyc.org/radiolab/radiolab090310.mp3 Story on Ted about 4 minutes in.
> Be Careful What You Plan For

Transcript:

Jad Abumrad: 00:04:10 I'm Jad.
Robert Krulwich: 00:04:13 I'm Robert.
Jad Abumrad: 00:04:14 On this episode of Radio Lab four oops'. Starting with a tree.
Robert Krulwich: 00:04:25 Then we've got a goose that went ...
Jad Abumrad: 00:04:29 And an entire town that went ...
Robert Krulwich: 00:04:31 And a Harvard professor-
Jad Abumrad: 00:04:34 That really went oops.
Robert Krulwich: 00:04:34 Yeah.
Jad Abumrad: 00:04:35 Now, we should just say before we start oops can be a misleading term. Really what we're talking about here is something Greek.
Robert Krulwich: 00:04:43 Where you try hard to prevent one thing, and then you get exactly what you didn't want to get back at you.
Jad Abumrad: 00:04:48 Right, and our first story falls into that category. Back a few seasons ago, we were doing a show on deception, and we ended up talking with a professor named Ruben Gur.
Ruben Gur: 00:04:58 Yes? Hello?
Jad Abumrad: 00:04:59 Hi is this professor Gur?
Ruben Gur: 00:05:00 Yes, speaking.
Jad Abumrad: 00:05:01 He's a psychiatrist that works at the University of Pennsylvania, and I'd called him to talk about his research on self deception.
Ruben Gur: 00:05:06 Self deception.
Jad Abumrad: 00:05:07 It's fascinating stuff, and I'm not going to go into it now because somewhere along the way the conversation took a really weird turn.
No.
Ruben Gur: 00:05:14 Oh yeah.
Jad Abumrad: 00:05:16 Get out.
Ruben Gur: 00:05:17 Yeah, yeah.
Jad Abumrad: 00:05:17 It happened when he began to tell me about some studies.
Ruben Gur: 00:05:20 Strange studies-
Jad Abumrad: 00:05:22 Done by a ... What was the guys name?
Ruben Gur: 00:05:24 His name is hanging ... I don't remember. Hold on a second, Murray was his name.
Jad Abumrad: 00:05:34 Henry Murray.
Robert Krulwich: 00:05:37 The reason we want to hear about Henry Murray is what?
Jad Abumrad: 00:05:40 What? I built it up. Don't you want to know more at this point?
Robert Krulwich: 00:05:41 Yeah, no. Tell me why.
Jad Abumrad: 00:05:45 Okay, I'm going to let it unfold, because we were so interested in what Ruben Gur told us that we found the guy.
Alston Chase: 00:05:50 Hi.
Jad Abumrad: 00:05:51 How's it going?
Who knows a whole lot about professor Murray. His name is Alston Chase.
Alston Chase: 00:05:55 Very windy day today, isn't it?
Jad Abumrad: 00:05:57 He lives in a remote cabin in Montana, in the woods, in the foothills.
Alston Chase: 00:06:03 Professor Murray was a very prestigious scholar. He had been a professor of psychology at Harvard before the second World War. During the war, he went to work for the OSS, the Office of Strategic Services, which was the forerunner of the CIA.
Jad Abumrad: 00:06:19 A couple of years into his government service, says Alston, something happened that really spooked him and spooked the country.
Alston Chase: 00:06:26 During the Korean War-
Jad Abumrad: 00:06:29 There were some GI's, he said, who'd been captured in Korea, and afterwards-
Alston Chase: 00:06:33 After the Korean War-
Jad Abumrad: 00:06:34 ... they refused to come home.
Alston Chase: 00:06:35 ... they appeared to have betrayed their country.
Speaker 12: 00:06:39 Renounce their own country and disappeared behind red China's bamboo curtain.
Speaker 13: 00:06:43 Now, does anybody want to go home?
Speaker 14: 00:06:45 No.
Alston Chase: 00:06:46 The CIA and the military establishment was very much concerned that the communists had found techniques for brainwashing.
Jad Abumrad: 00:06:57 Murray and other psychiatrists in the government were charged with preparing those soldiers to resist that kind of brainwashing. Murray himself developed a style of interrogation.
Alston Chase: 00:07:07 Stressful interrogation was the term used.
Jad Abumrad: 00:07:10 That the army could use on its pilots.
Ruben Gur: 00:07:12 Yeah, they developed this method of kidnapping them before they were sent onto mission.
Jad Abumrad: 00:07:17 Then, says Ruben Gur, he'd run them through a battery of tests ...
Ruben Gur: 00:07:20 To see if they break, and if they didn't break then they were fine to fly.
Jad Abumrad: 00:07:24 This kind of psychological training was almost a new front in the cold war. In the 1950s Murray is back at Harvard, and he's thinking of ways to fine tune his techniques, and this is where things get interesting.
Alston Chase: 00:07:37 He took a class of Harvard undergraduates, 20 some odd-
Jad Abumrad: 00:07:40 Sophomores mostly.
Alston Chase: 00:07:43 The students were told to write an autobiographical essay.
Jad Abumrad: 00:07:45 Like a diary, and he told them, you know what-
Alston Chase: 00:07:47 Make it very personal.
Jad Abumrad: 00:07:48 ... write your deepest thoughts in there.
Alston Chase: 00:07:50 Highest aspirations, and hopes-
Jad Abumrad: 00:07:52 And while you're at it, write about your sexual fantasies.
Robert Krulwich: 00:07:57 Quite a class.
Jad Abumrad: 00:07:57 Go ahead. After the students were done he said to them "Now I'm going to pair you up into groups of two."
Alston Chase: 00:08:01 To debate, or discuss, what they'd written.
Jad Abumrad: 00:08:05 Students were like, okay we'll share, no big deal. But-
Alston Chase: 00:08:11 They were duped. They were walked into this very brightly lit room-
Jad Abumrad: 00:08:17 Which turned out to be an interrogation room with a one way mirror.
Alston Chase: 00:08:19 ... put in a chair, strapped in, electrodes were attached to their arms, chest, their heart.
Jad Abumrad: 00:08:27 To measure stress basically.
Alston Chase: 00:08:29 They were also filming through the mirror.
Jad Abumrad: 00:08:32 Then, instead of a classmate in walked a total stranger.
Alston Chase: 00:08:36 Older man-
Jad Abumrad: 00:08:36 This guy was holding their essay. They didn't know it, but Murray had trained him-
Alston Chase: 00:08:40 To do everything he could to anger and humiliate the undergraduate.
Jad Abumrad: 00:08:45 He just tore them apart piece by piece.
Alston Chase: 00:08:49 Using the essay to mock the students aspirations, and thoughts. Then after this was done the students have to come back week after week to view themselves on film being humiliated.
Jad Abumrad: 00:09:07 That, to me, seems like the worst part. After they'd been humiliated, they had to watch themselves being humiliated over and over.
Alston Chase: 00:09:14 People became tearful, and miserable, and he was proud how he destroyed people.
Robert Krulwich: 00:09:19 What kind of a person is this?
Jad Abumrad: 00:09:22 Like why did he do it?
Robert Krulwich: 00:09:23 Yeah.
Alston Chase: 00:09:23 Why Murray did it, there are any one of a number of explanations and they all could be true. One is it was grant grabbing. He was getting money to do these things.
Jad Abumrad: 00:09:33 Also, this was the Cold War, he was fighting communism, maybe he thought it was justified.
Robert Krulwich: 00:09:37 Yeah, but he just said he was proud of this.
Jad Abumrad: 00:09:40 Well, it also happens to be the case that he was having an affair.
Alston Chase: 00:09:44 For about 30 years, with a woman not his wife, and they had a sexual relationship that border on, in fact was, sadomasochistic. In other words, Murray's interests in these was intensely personal.
Jad Abumrad: 00:10:00 Whatever the case, in those Harvard experiments there was one student who was just not prepared for any of it.
Ruben Gur: 00:10:06 His code name was Lawful.
Alston Chase: 00:10:08 They gave each of these students a code name.
Ruben Gur: 00:10:11 Because he was considered so conventional.
Alston Chase: 00:10:13 He was-
Jad Abumrad: 00:10:14 Really still just a boy.
Alston Chase: 00:10:15 Graduated high school at 16.
Ruben Gur: 00:10:16 Was living a thousand miles from home, two shirts and two trousers to his name.
Jad Abumrad: 00:10:21 And Lawful apparently was an especially lonely kid.
Ruben Gur: 00:10:24 The notes I found of Murray did refer specifically to Lawful's essay which he saw as highly alienated.
Jad Abumrad: 00:10:31 When Lawful walked into that room, sat across from that stranger-
Alston Chase: 00:10:35 The guy really made a job on him. He was young so he was barely growing a beard. The first thing that the guy tells him is what is this on your chin? Something trying to look like a beard.
Jad Abumrad: 00:10:47 Then the guy opens up Lawful's essay and lets him have it. Meanwhile, like all of the students Lawful had been hooked up to all of these stress monitors.
Alston Chase: 00:10:55 I analyzed his data compared to all the other participants, and he had far and away the strongest response physiologically.
Jad Abumrad: 00:11:03 You mean like his heart beat the fastest and all that?
Alston Chase: 00:11:05 Heart beat, everything through the roof.
Jad Abumrad: 00:11:12 Amazingly, this experiment went on for three years. Decades later, a lot of the subjects were still upset.
Ruben Gur: 00:11:19 Considered it one of the most traumatic experiences they'd had in their 20s.
Jad Abumrad: 00:11:23 Lawful never forgot it.
Ruben Gur: 00:11:25 That's right. He was resentful at the way he was treated at Harvard. He had nightmares about professor Murray after he left Harvard.
Robert Krulwich: 00:11:33 So what happened to this guy?
Jad Abumrad: 00:11:36 Well, he finished up his four years at Harvard, got his degree, then got a PhD in math. Then he began to teach math, and then he became a household name.
Robert Krulwich: 00:11:45 What do you mean?
Jad Abumrad: 00:11:46 Well, I mean this ...
Speaker 12: 00:11:48 The FBI raid began just after noon, in a remote mountainous area called Stemple Pass, about five miles outside the town of Lincoln, Montana.
Jad Abumrad: 00:11:56 Turns out that Lawful's real name-
Ruben Gur: 00:11:58 Theodore Kaczynski.
Jad Abumrad: 00:12:00 No?
Ruben Gur: 00:12:01 Oh yeah.
Jad Abumrad: 00:12:01 Get out.
Ruben Gur: 00:12:02 Yeah.
Speaker 12: 00:12:03 The FBI dubbed him the unabomber. In nearly 18 years he found targets all over the country.
Speaker 15: 00:12:09 His meticulously made bombs have killed three people and injured another 23.
Speaker 16: 00:12:13 Blew my arm off to the side like this, and the first thing I thought was why did they do that.
Jad Abumrad: 00:12:20 Do you think that this study had anything to do with Ted Kaczynski's subsequent very infamous acts?
Ruben Gur: 00:12:28 Well, I think he probably would have, if it hadn't been for that experiment he still probably would have been maybe reclusive, living somewhere in a cabin in Montana regardless. I think the evil twist was done there.
Jad Abumrad: 00:12:45 Years later while he was researching a book, Alston Chase corresponded with Kaczynski.
Alston Chase: 00:12:50 In one of his letters he mentioned that he participated in some psychological experiments conducted by professor Murray. Of course, I was very curious and I wrote it back "Can you tell me a little bit more about it?" And he said, "Well I don't know if you want to go into that can of worms."
Jad Abumrad: 00:13:19 Ruben Gur is a professor of psychiatry at the University of Pennsylvania and Alston Chase is the author of the book Harvard And The Making Of The Unabomber.
Heres one more, from Ben Zimmer. What is the Coopertino effect?
Ben Zimmer: 00:13:46 The Coopertino effect is the name given to the phenomenon of when you rely on a spellchecker too much. It will give you a suggestion, and very often it's a suggestion that you really shouldn't take.

Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Occupy LA Press Release


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Cheryl Aichele 

PRESS ADVISORY
WHO: Members of Occupy Los Angeles
WHAT: Kick Off a Campaign to End Political Repression of Occupiers and Activists after U.N. Letter
WHEN: July 3, 2012, 8:30am – Noon
WHERE: 8:30am Court House at 210 Temple Street; 9:30am Board of Police Commissioners meeting at 100 W. First Street; 10am LA City Council meeting at 200 N. Spring Street. Pershing Square after that.
WHY: The U.N. has contacted the Obama Administration in regards to Local Law Enforcement Repressing Occupiers’ Rights and Occupy LA is fighting back

PRESS RELEASE
OCCUPY LA FIGHTS REPRESSION AFTER US IGNORES UN PLEA TO PROTECT OCCUPIERS’ RIGHTS
Members of Occupy LA Kick of a Campaign to End Political Repression of Occupiers and Activists

LOS ANGELES – Over six months after Envoys of the United Nations wrote a letter to the Obama Administration, the U.S. government has yet to response to requests regarding local repression of the Occupy movement. Members of Occupy LA plan to push the issue with local and federal governments after alleged increase of Rights violations by LAPD.

Occupiers feel LAPD has targeted them in attempt to silence their dissent and stop their actions. Courtroom witnesses have been threatened with arrest; Occupiers have been arrested for chalk art; and say they are victims of police misconduct.

The day before Independence Day in America, Occupy LA members gather for court support for Anthony Lascano, an Occupy activist, who the courts unexpectantly took into custody on Monday afternoon.

A Judge has set Lascano’s bail at $75,000. An amount Occupiers says exemplifies increase political repression and Human Rights violations against Occupiers by LAPD, the so-called Justice System, and the U.S. Government.

Occupy activists plan to occupy the courtroom for Lascano’s bail hearing, City Council Chambers, and the LAPD
Board of Police Commissioners meeting Tuesday morning in protest  of said repression.

Occupiers claim the LAPD have made 11 Occupy arrests in three weeks for chalking.

In a letter dated June 4, Carol Sobel, a First-Amendment-Rights lawyer with the National Lawyers Guild, explained to the Special Assistant for Constitutional Policing for the LAPD that the 9th Circuit unanimously held that “no chalk would damage a sidewalk” in MacKinney v. Nielsen from 1995.

“Given that this decision is now 18 years old, there is no excuse for these arrests,” states Sobel in the letter.

Occupiers say LA’s current graffiti laws do not reflect the Constitutional ruling yet. Activist point out that elected officials and police officers are sworn to uphold and protect the Constitution. However, many Occupiers feel individuals of these entities systematically repress their Rights.

The City of Orlando recently spent $200,000 defending a chalk-art arrest of an Occupier in Florida. The city lost that case and activists say that the City of Los Angeles could waste up to $2.4 million dollars defending the 11 chalking arrests this month.

Occupiers believe the LAPD selectively enforces the graffiti law against them while the City’s own Parking Enforcement officers use chalk on the tires of vehicles they wish to monitor for time restrictions.

The activist also say, that the police did not arrest any activists at this weekend’s anti-Walmart protest in downtown organized by Labor and other community groups.  From photos of the event, it clearly had plenty of chalk art written on the pavement surrounding the actions.

So far, the activists know of no arrests of children for the summer activity of chalking on cement. Activists argue the chalk comes in packaging marketed for sidewalk art us and that water-soluble chalk does no damage.

Members of Occupy LA allege that City Officials violate California Civil Code 52.1. They say LAPD — under the color of law— interferes with their exercise and enjoyment of their Rights by threats, intimidation, and coercion.

To avoid prosecution, the City required dozens of Occupy LA arrestees to take a First-Amendment-Rights class administered through the City Attorney’s office.  Now, Occupy LA says it is the City that needs a lesson in the First Amendment. 

R.D. Laing

R.D. Laing
Speaking on Autonomy